<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Laurent+Drouet</id>
	<title>IAMC-Documentation - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Laurent+Drouet"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/Special:Contributions/Laurent_Drouet"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T06:33:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.15</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=12373</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=12373"/>
		<updated>2020-05-13T12:25:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Version=5.0&lt;br /&gt;
|participation=full&lt;br /&gt;
|processState=published&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionConceptOption=General equilibrium (closed economy)&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionHorizon=inter-temporal (foresight);&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethodOption=Optimization&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=17&lt;br /&gt;
|PoliciesOption=Emission tax; Emission pricing; Cap and trade; Fuel taxes; Fuel subsidies; Capacity targets; Emission standards&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|PopulationOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|PopulationAgeStructureOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|EducationLevelOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|UrbanizationRateOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|GDPOption=Yes (endogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|TotalFactorProductivityOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|AutonomousEnergyEfficiencyImprovementsOption=Yes (exogenous)&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Electricity; Bioenergy crops; Capital; Emissions permits; Non-energy goods&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system cost mark-up&lt;br /&gt;
|CoalRUOption=Yes (supply curve)&lt;br /&gt;
|ConventionalOilRUOption=Yes (process model)&lt;br /&gt;
|UnconventionalOilRUOption=Yes (process model)&lt;br /&gt;
|ConventionalGasRUOption=Yes (fixed)&lt;br /&gt;
|Unconventional GasRUOption=Yes (fixed)&lt;br /&gt;
|UraniumRUOption=Yes (fixed)&lt;br /&gt;
|BioenergyRUOption=Yes (supply curve)&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyEnd-useTCOption=Endogenous technological change&lt;br /&gt;
|AgricultureTCOption=Exogenous technological change&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyTechnologyChoiceOption=No discrete technology choices&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyTechnologySubstitutabilityOption=Mostly high substitutability&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyTechnologyDeploymentOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal w/o CCS; Coal w/ CCS; Gas w/o CCS; Gas w/ CCS; Oil w/o CCS; Oil w/ CCS; Bioenergy w/o CCS; Bioenergy w/ CCS; Nuclear power; Solar power; Solar power-central PV; Solar power-CSP; Wind power; Wind power-onshore; Wind power-offshore; Hydroelectric power; Solar power-distributed PV&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityGIOption=Yes (aggregate)&lt;br /&gt;
|PassengerTransportationOption=Light Duty Vehicles (LDVs); Electric LDVs; Hybrid LDVs; Diesel LDVs&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|LandCoverOption=Cropland; Forest; Pasture; Cropland irrigated&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=HFCs; CO2 fossil fuels; CO2 land use; CH4 energy; CH4 land use; CH4 other; N2O energy; N2O land use; N2O other&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=CO energy; CO land use; CO other; NOx energy; NOx land use; NOx other; VOC energy; VOC land use; VOC other; SO2 energy; SO2 land use; SO2 other; BC energy; BC land use; BC other; OC energy; OC land use; OC other; NH3 energy; NH3 land use; NH3 other&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=Temperature change; Concentration: CO2; Concentration: CH4; Concentration: N2O; Concentration: Kyoto gases; Radiative forcing: CO2; Radiative forcing: CH4; Radiative forcing: N2O; Radiative forcing: F-gases; Radiative forcing: Kyoto gases; Radiative forcing: aerosols; Radiative forcing: land albedo; Radiative forcing: AN3A; Radiative forcing: total&lt;br /&gt;
|CarbonDioxideRemovalOption=Bioenergy with CCS; Reforestation; Afforestation; Direct air capture&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateChangeImpactsOption=Economic output&lt;br /&gt;
|Co-LinkagesOption=Air pollution &amp;amp; health: Source-based aerosol emissions; Air pollution &amp;amp; health: Health impacts of air Pollution&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=RFF-CMCC EIEE&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=European Institute on Economics and the Environment&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.eiee.org&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11401</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11401"/>
		<updated>2020-03-12T10:55:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Version=5.0&lt;br /&gt;
|participation=full&lt;br /&gt;
|processState=published&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=Flexible, 17 regions by default&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; mena: Middle East and North Africa; sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America; europe: EU countries + UK + Switzerland + Norway; indonesia: Indonesia; mexico: Mexico; brazil: Brazil; canada: Canada; jpnkor: Japan and South Korea; southafrica: South Africa; oceania: Australia, New Zealand and Pacific Islands;&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CCS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=CO2; CH4; N2O; HFCs; CFCs; SF6&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=NOx; SOx; BC; OC&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=CO2e concentration (ppm); Radiative Forcing (W/m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ); Temperature change (°C); Climate damages $ or equivalent&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=EIEE&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.eiee.org&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11398</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11398"/>
		<updated>2020-03-12T10:54:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Version=5.0&lt;br /&gt;
|participation=full&lt;br /&gt;
|processState=published&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=Flexible, 17 regions by default&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; mena: Middle East and North Africa; sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America; europe: EU countries + UK + Switzerland + Norway; indonesia: Indonesia; mexico: Mexico; brazil: Brazil; canada: Canada; jpnkor: Japan and South Korea;&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CCS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=CO2; CH4; N2O; HFCs; CFCs; SF6&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=NOx; SOx; BC; OC&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=CO2e concentration (ppm); Radiative Forcing (W/m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ); Temperature change (°C); Climate damages $ or equivalent&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=EIEE&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.eiee.org&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11395</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11395"/>
		<updated>2020-03-12T10:50:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Version=5.0&lt;br /&gt;
|participation=full&lt;br /&gt;
|processState=published&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CCS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=CO2; CH4; N2O; HFCs; CFCs; SF6&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=NOx; SOx; BC; OC&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=CO2e concentration (ppm); Radiative Forcing (W/m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ); Temperature change (°C); Climate damages $ or equivalent&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=EIEE&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.eiee.org&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11392</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=11392"/>
		<updated>2020-03-12T10:49:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Version=WITCH 5.0&lt;br /&gt;
|participation=full&lt;br /&gt;
|processState=published&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CCS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=CO2; CH4; N2O; HFCs; CFCs; SF6&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=NOx; SOx; BC; OC&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=CO2e concentration (ppm); Radiative Forcing (W/m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ); Temperature change (°C); Climate damages $ or equivalent&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=EIEE&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.eiee.org&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_Documentation_-_WITCH&amp;diff=6280</id>
		<title>Model Documentation - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_Documentation_-_WITCH&amp;diff=6280"/>
		<updated>2016-11-23T09:32:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Model Documentation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH (World Induced Technical Change Hybrid) is an optimal growth model of the world economy that integrates into a unified framework the sources and the consequences of climate change. A climate module links GHG emissions produced by economic activities to their accumulation in the atmosphere and the oceans. The effect of these GHG concentrations on the global mean temperature is derived. A damage function explicitly accounts for the consequences of temperature increases on the economic system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regions interact with each other because of the presence of economic (technology, exhaustible natural resources) and global environmental externalities. For each region, a forward-looking agent maximises its inter-temporal social welfare function, strategically and simultaneously to other regions. The inter-temporal equilibrium is calculated as an open-loop Nash equilibrium, or, a cooperative solution can also be solved by aggregating the welfare of each region. More precisely, the Nash equilibrium is the outcome of a non-cooperative, simultaneous, open membership game with full information. Through the optimisation process, regions choose the optimal dynamic path of a set of control variables, namely investments in the main economic variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH is a hard-link hybrid model because the energy sector is fully integrated with the rest of the economy and therefore investments and the quantity of resources for energy generation are chosen optimally, together with the other macroeconomic variables. The model can be defined hybrid because the energy sector features a bottom-up characterization. A broad range of different fuels and technologies can be used in the generation of energy. The energy sector endogenously accounts for technological change, with considerations for the positive externalities stemming from Learning-By-Doing and Learning-By-Researching. Overall, the economy of each region consists of eight sectors: one final good, which can be used for consumption or investments, and seven energy sectors (or technologies): coal, oil, gas, wind &amp;amp; solar, nuclear, electricity, and bio-fuels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The official model documentation is available at [http://doc.witchmodel.org]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_Documentation_-_WITCH&amp;diff=6279</id>
		<title>Model Documentation - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_Documentation_-_WITCH&amp;diff=6279"/>
		<updated>2016-11-23T09:30:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Model Documentation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH (World Induced Technical Change Hybrid) is an optimal growth model of the world economy that integrates into a unified framework the sources and the consequences of climate change. A climate module links GHG emissions produced by economic activities to their accumulation in the atmosphere and the oceans. The effect of these GHG concentrations on the global mean temperature is derived. A damage function explicitly accounts for the consequences of temperature increases on the economic system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regions interact with each other because of the presence of economic (technology, exhaustible natural resources) and global environmental externalities. For each region, a forward-looking agent maximises its inter-temporal social welfare function, strategically and simultaneously to other regions. The inter-temporal equilibrium is calculated as an open-loop Nash equilibrium, or, a cooperative solution can also be solved by aggregating the welfare of each region. More precisely, the Nash equilibrium is the outcome of a non-cooperative, simultaneous, open membership game with full information. Through the optimisation process, regions choose the optimal dynamic path of a set of control variables, namely investments in the main economic variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH is a hard-link hybrid model because the energy sector is fully integrated with the rest of the economy and therefore investments and the quantity of resources for energy generation are chosen optimally, together with the other macroeconomic variables. The model can be defined hybrid because the energy sector features a bottom-up characterization. A broad range of different fuels and technologies can be used in the generation of energy. The energy sector endogenously accounts for technological change, with considerations for the positive externalities stemming from Learning-By-Doing and Learning-By-Researching. Overall, the economy of each region consists of eight sectors: one final good, which can be used for consumption or investments, and seven energy sectors (or technologies): coal, oil, gas, wind &amp;amp; solar, nuclear, electricity, and bio-fuels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An alternative documentation is available at [http://doc.witchmodel.org]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5424</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5424"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T16:18:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: /* Air Pollution Policies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WITCH air pollution module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation originates from the [http://www.feem-project.net/limits LIMITS project] and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models GAINS model] in the context of the [https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality EMF30] exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; of pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; at time period &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; according to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; is the emission factor related to activity, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; of sector &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants p: carbon monoxide CO, methane CH4, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon BC, organic carbon OC, sulfur dioxide SO2,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides NOx, ammonia NH3 and volatile organic compounds VOC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A)&lt;br /&gt;
provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; are the WITCH sectors and &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO2 emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html SNAP sectors]), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome RCP]) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Air Pollution Policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; for activity category &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; and for pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5414</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5414"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:54:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WITCH air pollution module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation originates from the [http://www.feem-project.net/limits LIMITS project] and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models GAINS model] in the context of the [https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality EMF30] exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; of pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; at time period &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; according to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; is the emission factor related to activity, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; of sector &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants p: carbon monoxide CO, methane CH4, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon BC, organic carbon OC, sulfur dioxide SO2,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides NOx, ammonia NH3 and volatile organic compounds VOC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A)&lt;br /&gt;
provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; are the WITCH sectors and &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO2 emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html SNAP sectors]), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome RCP]) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Air Pollution Policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor &#039;&#039;ef_{j,p}(t)&#039;&#039; for activity category &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; and for pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5413</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5413"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:53:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WITCH air pollution module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. The implementation originates from the [http://www.feem-project.net/limits LIMITS project] and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models GAINS model] in the context of the [https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality EMF30] exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; of pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; at time period &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; according to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; is the emission factor related to activity, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; of sector &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants p: carbon monoxide CO, methane CH4, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon BC, organic carbon OC, sulfur dioxide SO2,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides NOx, ammonia NH3 and volatile organic compounds VOC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A)&lt;br /&gt;
provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; are the WITCH sectors and &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO2 emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html SNAP sectors]), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome RCP]) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Air Pollution Policies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor &#039;&#039;ef_{j,p}(t)&#039;&#039; for activity category &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; and for pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5412</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5412"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:49:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The air quality module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. The implementation originates from the [http://www.feem-project.net/limits LIMITS project] and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models GAINS model] in the context of the [https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality EMF30] exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions &#039;&#039;E&#039;&#039; of pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; at time period &#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039; according to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; is the emission factor related to activity, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; of sector  &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants p: carbon monoxide CO, methane CH4, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon BC, organic carbon OC, sulphur dioxide SO2,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides NOx, ammonia NH3 and volatile organic compounds VOC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors &#039;&#039;ef_{j,p}(t)&#039;&#039; are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A)&lt;br /&gt;
provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; are the WITCH sectors and &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039; is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO2 emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html SNAP sectors]), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome RCP]) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Air Pollution Policies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor &#039;&#039;ef_{j,p}(t)&#039;&#039; for activity category &#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039; and for pollutant &#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the &#039;&#039;ef&#039;&#039; are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5408</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5408"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:43:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The air quality module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. The implementation originates from the [http://www.feem-project.net/limits LIMITS project] and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models GAINS model] in the context of the [https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality EMF30] exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions _E_ of pollutant _p_ at time period _t_ according to&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where $ef_{j,p}(t)$ is the emission factor related to activity, $A$ of sector $j$.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants **p**: carbon monoxide **CO**, methane **CH4**, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon **BC**, organic carbon **OC**, sulphur dioxide **SO2**,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides **NOx**, ammonia **NH3** and volatile organic compounds **VOC**.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors $ef_{j,p}(t)$ are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A) provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math style=&amp;quot;font-size: 1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where $j$ are the WITCH sectors and $p$ is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO$_2$ emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([SNAP sectors](http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html)), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [RCP](http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Air Pollution Policies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor $ef_{j,p}(t)$ for activity category $j$ and for pollutant $p$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the $ef_{j,p}(t)$ are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5407</id>
		<title>Air pollution and health - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Air_pollution_and_health_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5407"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:36:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Air pollution and health&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The air quality module relates the pollution economic activities to&lt;br /&gt;
emission levels of the most significant air pollutants. It allows the assessment of air pollution emissions in baseline scenarios or under a climate or pollution regulation scenario. The implementation originates from the [LIMITS project](http://www.feem-project.net/limits/) and&lt;br /&gt;
Its emission factors have been calculated from the [GAINS model](http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models/) in the context of the [EMF30](https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-30-short-lived-climate-forcers-air-quality) exercise. &lt;br /&gt;
In the WITCH model we use information on both fuel use and the type of electricity generation technologies employed to compute the emissions $E$ of pollutant $p$ at time period $t$ according to&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$$&lt;br /&gt;
 E_{p} = \sum_{j}^{ } A_{j}ef_{j,p}(t)&lt;br /&gt;
$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where $ef_{j,p}(t)$ is the emission factor related to activity, $A$ of sector $j$.&lt;br /&gt;
We consider the air pollutants **p**: carbon monoxide **CO**, methane **CH4**, &lt;br /&gt;
black carbon **BC**, organic carbon **OC**, sulphur dioxide **SO2**,&lt;br /&gt;
nitrogen oxides **NOx**, ammonia **NH3** and volatile organic compounds **VOC**.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors $ef_{j,p}(t)$ are calculated using the ratio of emissions(E) over activities(A) provided by GAINS, these are at a first stage aggregated over the WITCH sectors (see sector mapping on the Appendix), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$$&lt;br /&gt;
 ef_{j,p}(t) = \frac{E_{j,p,\text{GAINS}}}{A_{j,\text{GAINS}}} ,&lt;br /&gt;
$$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where $j$ are the WITCH sectors and $p$ is the pollutant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emission factors are then aggregated into the WITCH regions, using the mean weighted by country&#039;s level of CO$_2$ emissions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In WITCH we do not model all the activities that generate air pollution, therefore the non-energy related pollution is accounted for exogenously. For this non-modelled sectors the emissions are taken directly from available databases and mapped into the ([SNAP sectors](http://www.emep.int/UniDoc/node7.html)), which are sector categories for reporting air pollutant levels. The emissions of the exo-sectors (sectors that are related to energy but are not accounted in the model directly, see the table in Appendix), from the EMF30 database. The non-energy sectors, such as Solvents, Waste (landfills, waste water, non-energy incineration), Agriculture waste burning on fields, Agriculture, Grassland burning and Forest burning and the emissions of ammonia follow the RCP8.5 emissions from the [RCP](http://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at:8787/RcpDb/dsd?Action=htmlpage&amp;amp;page=welcome) database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Air Pollution Policies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air pollution emissions depend on two important factors, the activity level of the pollutant sector, and the emission factor of that given activity. Therefore the implementation of policies can be done via structural measures, such as changes in the model endogenous activities, or via air pollution controls. the latter is undertaken by controlling the emission factor $ef_{j,p}(t)$ for activity category $j$ and for pollutant $p$.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accordingly, the $ef_{j,p}(t)$ are defined per air pollution scenario/baseline/policy, which corresponds to different levels of control, also called End-of-Pipe (EOP), measures. The air pollution scenarios are CLE (current legislation), SLE (stringent legislation) and MFR (maximum feasible reduction). The CLE scenario corresponds to the implementation until 2030 of all the legislation already (in 2013) foreseen and/or enforced for that period; The SLE scenario foresees the implementation of 75% of the MFR scenario which corresponds to the maximal technological frontier of EOP. &lt;br /&gt;
For the exogenous sectors the implementation of policies has to be carried out via emission pathways.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5404</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5404"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:14:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CSS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|GHGOption=CO2; CH4; N2O; HFCs; CFCs; SFs&lt;br /&gt;
|PollutantOption=NOx; SOx; BC; OC&lt;br /&gt;
|ClimateIndicatorOption=CO2e concentration (ppm); Radiative Forcing (Wm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ); Temperature change (C°); Climate damages $ or equivalent&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5402</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5402"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:08:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CSS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|OtherResourceOption=Water&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5400</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5400"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:07:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CSS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-use=Cropland; Forest;&lt;br /&gt;
|Land-useText=Bioenergy related cost and emissions are obtained by an soft linking with the GLOBIOM model.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5399</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5399"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:06:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ResourceUseOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Uranium; Biomass&lt;br /&gt;
|ElectricityTechnologyOption=Coal; Gas; Oil; Nuclear; Biomass; Wind; Solar PV; CSS&lt;br /&gt;
|GridInfrastructureOption=Electricity; CO2&lt;br /&gt;
|TechnologySubstitutionOption=Expansion and decline constraints; System integration constraints&lt;br /&gt;
|EnergyServiceSectorOption=Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5398</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5398"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:04:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorOption=Energy&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSector=other;&lt;br /&gt;
|EconomicSectorText=A single economy sector is represented. Production inputs are capital, labor and energy services, accounting for the Energy sector split into 8 energy technologies sectors (coal, oil, gas, wind&amp;amp;solar, nuclear, electricity and biofuels).&lt;br /&gt;
|CostMeasureOption=GDP loss; Welfare loss; Consumption loss; Energy system costs&lt;br /&gt;
|TradeOption=Coal; Oil; Gas; Emissions permits&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5397</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5397"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T14:00:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity; Labour Productivity; Capital Technical progress&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5395</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5395"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T13:57:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|ExogenousDriverOption=Total Factor Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5393</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5393"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T13:55:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.feem.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=CMCC&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici&lt;br /&gt;
|link=http://www.cmcc.it&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5372</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=5372"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T10:57:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Objective=WITCH evaluates the impacts of climate policies on global and regional economic systems and provides information on the optimal responses of these economies to climate change. The model considers the positive externalities from leaning-by-doing and learning-by-researching in the technological change.&lt;br /&gt;
|Concept=Hybrid: Economic optimal growth model, including a bottom-up energy sector and a simple climate model, embedded in a `game theory` framework.&lt;br /&gt;
|SolutionMethod=Regional growth models solved by non-linear optimization and game theoretic setup solved by tatonnement algorithm (cooperative solution: Negishi welfare aggregation, non-cooperative solution: Nash equilibrium)&lt;br /&gt;
|Anticipation=Perfect foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
|Nr=14&lt;br /&gt;
|Region=cajaz: Canada, Japan, New Zeland; china: China, including Taiwan; easia: South East Asia; india: India; kosau: South Korea, South Africa, Australia; laca: Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean; indo: Indonesia; mena: Middle East and North Africa; neweuro: EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway; oldeuro: EU old countries (EU-15); sasia: South Asia; ssa: Sub Saharan Africa; te: Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia; usa: United States of America;&lt;br /&gt;
|SpatialText=The number of regions is not fixed, as they can be aggregated or downscaled until country level.&lt;br /&gt;
|PolicyImplementation=Quantitative climate targets (temperature, radiative forcing, concentration), carbon budgets, emissions profiles as optimization constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
Allocation and trading of emission permits, banking and borrowing.&lt;br /&gt;
Subsidies, taxes and penalty on energies sources.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InstitutionTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|abbr=FEEM&lt;br /&gt;
|institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei&lt;br /&gt;
|country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Spatial_dimension_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5371</id>
		<title>Spatial dimension - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Spatial_dimension_-_WITCH&amp;diff=5371"/>
		<updated>2016-10-11T10:42:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Spatial dimension&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Countries included within the model are grouped into 14 regions clustered by geography, income and the structure of energy demand. Regional disaggregation can be easily performed subject to the issue being tackled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:35815545.png]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1.1: Regions of the WITCH model (except that India and Indonesia are not detached from their former regions, sasia and easia, respectively).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 14 regions are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class = &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Region&lt;br /&gt;
! Countries&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cajaz&lt;br /&gt;
|Canada, Japan, New Zealand&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|china&lt;br /&gt;
|China, including Taiwan&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easia&lt;br /&gt;
|South East Asia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|india&lt;br /&gt;
|India&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|indonesia&lt;br /&gt;
|Indonesia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kosau&lt;br /&gt;
|South Korea, South Africa, Australia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laca&lt;br /&gt;
|Latin America, Mexico and Caribbean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mena&lt;br /&gt;
|Middle East and North Africa&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|neweuro&lt;br /&gt;
|EU new countries + Switzerland + Norway&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|oldeuro&lt;br /&gt;
|EU old countries (EU-15)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sasia&lt;br /&gt;
|South Asia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ssa&lt;br /&gt;
|Sub Saharan Africa&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|te&lt;br /&gt;
|Non-EU Eastern European countries, including Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|usa&lt;br /&gt;
|United States of America&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH features any regional aggregations in the so-called coalitions. Some common coalitions are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* regional coalitions : each region is mapped to a coalition containing only this region.&lt;br /&gt;
* world coalition : a coalition containing all the world regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coalitions and regions interact with each others because of the presence of economic (technology, exhaustible natural resources) and environmental global externalities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=4836</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=4836"/>
		<updated>2016-08-30T12:41:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=4835</id>
		<title>WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=WITCH&amp;diff=4835"/>
		<updated>2016-08-30T12:39:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelInfoTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|Country=Italy&lt;br /&gt;
|Institution=Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{ScopeMethodTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|BaseYear=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|TimeSteps=5&lt;br /&gt;
|Horizon=2150&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Socio-economicTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Macro-economyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EnergyTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Land-useTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{OtherResourcesTemplate}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{EmissionClimateTemplate}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_concept,_solver_and_details_-_WITCH&amp;diff=4834</id>
		<title>Model concept, solver and details - WITCH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php?title=Model_concept,_solver_and_details_-_WITCH&amp;diff=4834"/>
		<updated>2016-08-30T12:37:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laurent Drouet: /* General Framework */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ModelDocumentationTemplate&lt;br /&gt;
|IsDocumentationOf=WITCH&lt;br /&gt;
|DocumentationCategory=Model concept, solver and details&lt;br /&gt;
|IsEmpty=No&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
== General Framework ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH (World Induced Technical Change Hybrid) is an optimal growth model of the world economy that integrates in a unified framework the sources and the consequences of climate change. A climate module links GHG emissions produced by economic activities to their accumulation in the atmosphere and the oceans. The effect of these GHG concentrations on the global mean temperature is derived. A damage function explicitly accounts for the effects of temperature increases on the economic system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regions interact with each other because of the presence of economic (technology, exhaustible natural resources) and environmental global externalities. For each region a forward-looking agent maximizes its own inter-temporal social welfare function, strategically and simultaneously to other regions. The inter-temporal equilibrium is calculated as an open-loop Nash equilibrium, or, a cooperative solution can also be solved by aggregating the welfare of each regions. More precisely, the Nash equilibrium is the outcome of a non-cooperative, simultaneous, open membership game with full information. Through the optimization process regions choose the optimal dynamic path of a set of control variables, namely investments in key economic variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WITCH is a hard-link hybrid model because the energy sector is fully integrated with the rest of the economy and therefore investments and the quantity of resources for energy generation are chosen optimally, together with the other macroeconomic variables. The model can be defined hybrid because the energy sector features a bottom-up characterization. A broad range of different fuels and technologies can be used in the generation of energy. The energy sector endogenously accounts for technological change, with considerations for the positive externalities stemming from Learning-By-Doing and Learning-By-Researching. Overall, the economy of each region consists of eight sectors: one final good, which can be used for consumption or investments, and seven energy sectors (or technologies): coal, oil, gas, wind &amp;amp;amp; solar, nuclear, electricity, and bio-fuels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Non-cooperative solution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game theoretic setup makes it possible to capture the non-cooperative nature of international relationships. Free-riding behaviors and strategic inaction induced by the presence of a global externality are explicitly accounted for in the model. Climate change is the major global externality, as GHG emissions produced by each region indirectly impact on all other regions through the effect on global concentrations and thus global average temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The model features other economic externalities that provide additional channels of interaction. Energy prices depend on the extraction of fossil fuels, which in turn is affected by consumption patterns of all regions in the world. International knowledge and experience spillovers are two additional sources of externalities. By investing in energy R&amp;amp;amp;D, each region accumulates a stock of knowledge that augments energy efficiency and reduces the cost of specific energy technologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect of knowledge is not confined to the inventor region but it can spread to other regions. Finally, the diffusion of knowledge embodied in wind&amp;amp;amp;solar experience is represented by learning curves linking investment costs with world, and not regional, cumulative capacity. Increasing capacity thus reduces investment costs for all regions. These externalities provide incentives to adopt strategic behaviours, both with respect to the environment (e.g. GHG emissions) and with respect to investments in knowledge and carbon-free but costly technologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two different solutions can be produced: a cooperative one that is globally optimal and a decentralised, non-cooperative one that is strategically optimal for each given region (Nash equilibrium). In the cooperative solution all externalities are internalised and therefore it can be interpreted as a first-best solution. The Nash equilibrium instead can be seen as a second-best solution. Intermediate degree of cooperation, both in terms of externalities addressed and&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;  participation can also be simulated.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Laurent Drouet</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>