Model concept, solver and details - GEM-E3 - Revision history

Leonidas Paroussos at 15:33, 21 October 2016

2016-10-21T15:33:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 21 October 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|DocumentationCategory=Model concept, solver and details		\|DocumentationCategory=Model concept, solver and details
	}}		}}
	The General Equilibrium Model for Economy-Energy-Environment (GEM-E3) is a multi-regional, multi-sectoral, recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model which provides details on the macro-economy and its interaction with the environment and the energy system. It is an empirical, large scale model written entirely in structural form.

	GEM-E3 incorporates micro-economic mechanisms and institutional features within a consistent macro-economic framework and avoids the representation of behaviour in reduced form. The GEM-E3 model includes projections of: full Input-Output tables by country/region, national accounts, employment, balance of payments, public finance and revenues, household consumption, energy use and supply, GHG emissions and atmospheric pollutants.

	The model features perfect competition market regimes, discrete representation of power producing technologies, semi-endogenous learning by doing effects, equilibrium unemployment, option to introduce energy efficiency standards, formulates emission permits for GHG and atmospheric pollutants. The environmental module includes flexibility instruments allowing for a variety of options when simulating emission abatement policies, including: different allocation schemes (grandfathering, auctioning, etc.), user-defined bubbles for traders, various systems of exemptions, various systems for revenue recycling, etc.

	The scope of GEM-E3 is general in two terms: it includes all simultaneously interrelated markets and represents the system at the appropriate level with respect to geography, the sub-system (energy, environment, economy) and the dynamic mechanisms of agent’s behaviour.		The scope of GEM-E3 is general in two terms: it includes all simultaneously interrelated markets and represents the system at the appropriate level with respect to geography, the sub-system (energy, environment, economy) and the dynamic mechanisms of agent’s behaviour.

Leonidas Paroussos at 13:29, 21 October 2016

2016-10-21T13:29:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 21 October 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:

	• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock.		• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock.


	The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.		The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.

Leonidas Paroussos at 13:28, 21 October 2016

2016-10-21T13:28:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 21 October 2016
Line 25:		Line 25:

	The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.		The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.


	Figure 1: GEM-E3 economic circuit		Figure 1: GEM-E3 economic circuit

	[[File:Figure 1 GEM-E3 economic circuit.jpg]]		[[File:Figure 1 GEM-E3 economic circuit.jpg]]


	The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:		The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:
Line 52:		Line 54:

	To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.		To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.


	Figure 2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3		Figure 2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3

	[[File:Figure 2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.gif]]		[[File:Figure 2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.gif]]


	A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.		A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.

Leonidas Paroussos at 09:37, 21 October 2016

2016-10-21T09:37:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 21 October 2016
Line 26:		Line 26:
	The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.		The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.

	Figure 1.1: GEM-E3 economic circuit		Figure 1: GEM-E3 economic circuit

	[[File:Figure 1.1 GEM-E3 economic circuit.jpg]]		[[File:Figure 1 GEM-E3 economic circuit.jpg]]

	The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:		The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:
Line 53:		Line 53:
	To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.		To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.

	Figure 1.2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3		Figure 2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3

	[[File:Figure 1.2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.gif]]		[[File:Figure 2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.gif]]

	A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.		A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:57, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:57:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 17 October 2016
Line 83:		Line 83:

	The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.		The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.


	'''History of GEM-E3'''		'''History of GEM-E3'''

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:55, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:55:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 17 October 2016
Line 83:		Line 83:

	The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.		The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.
	History of GEM-E3
			'''History of GEM-E3'''

	The GEM-E3 model is the result of a collaborative effort by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA/E3M-Lab, leading partner), Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KUL), University of Manheim and the centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Ecole Centrale de Paris (ERASME) as the core modelling team. NTUA/E3M-Lab have maintained and further developed the GEM-E3 model in various aspects including the introduction of market imperfections, the construction of GEM-E3 world version, bottom-up representation of power generation technologies, equilibrium unemployment, a complete coverage of all GHG, and the introduction of semi-endogenous growth features.		The GEM-E3 model is the result of a collaborative effort by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA/E3M-Lab, leading partner), Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KUL), University of Manheim and the centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Ecole Centrale de Paris (ERASME) as the core modelling team. NTUA/E3M-Lab have maintained and further developed the GEM-E3 model in various aspects including the introduction of market imperfections, the construction of GEM-E3 world version, bottom-up representation of power generation technologies, equilibrium unemployment, a complete coverage of all GHG, and the introduction of semi-endogenous growth features.

	Applications of the model have been carried out for several Directorate Generals of the European Commission (economic affairs, competition, environment, taxation, research) and for national authorities. GEM-E3 is used regularly to provide analytical support to European Commission services, particularly with regards to the economics of climate change.		Applications of the model have been carried out for several Directorate Generals of the European Commission (economic affairs, competition, environment, taxation, research) and for national authorities. GEM-E3 is used regularly to provide analytical support to European Commission services, particularly with regards to the economics of climate change.

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:53, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:53:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 17 October 2016
Line 33:		Line 33:

	• Capital mobility across sectors and/or countries		• Capital mobility across sectors and/or countries

	• Flexible or fixed current account (with respect to the foreign sector)		• Flexible or fixed current account (with respect to the foreign sector)

	• Flexible or fixed labour supply		• Flexible or fixed labour supply

	• Market for pollution permits national/international, environmental constraints		• Market for pollution permits national/international, environmental constraints

	• Fixed or flexible public deficit		• Fixed or flexible public deficit

	• Perfect competition or Nash-Cournot competition assumptions for market competition regimes.		• Perfect competition or Nash-Cournot competition assumptions for market competition regimes.


	'''Reference scenario and counterfactual simulations'''		'''Reference scenario and counterfactual simulations'''

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:50, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:50:52Z

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:23, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:23:34Z

Leonidas Paroussos at 10:17, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T10:17:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 17 October 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Figure 1.1: GEM-E3 economic circuit		Figure 1.1: GEM-E3 economic circuit

			[[File:Figure 1.1 GEM-E3 economic circuit.jpg]]

	The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:		The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 17 October 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:

	• Model design around a basic general equilibrium core in a modular way so that different modelling options, market regimes and closure rules are supported by the same model specification		• Model design around a basic general equilibrium core in a modular way so that different modelling options, market regimes and closure rules are supported by the same model specification

	• Fully flexible (endogenous) coefficients in production and in consumer’s demand		• Fully flexible (endogenous) coefficients in production and in consumer’s demand

	• Calibration to a base year data set, incorporating detailed Social Accounting Matrices as statistically observed		• Calibration to a base year data set, incorporating detailed Social Accounting Matrices as statistically observed

	• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock.		• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock.


	The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.		The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.
Line 45:		Line 49:
	Figure 1.2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3		Figure 1.2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3

	[[File:Figure 1.2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.~~jpg~~]]		[[File:Figure 1.2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.gif]]

	A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.		A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.
Line 52:		Line 56:

	• Dynamic annual projections in volume, value and deflators of national accounts by country		• Dynamic annual projections in volume, value and deflators of national accounts by country

	• Full Input-Output tables for each country/region identified in the model		• Full Input-Output tables for each country/region identified in the model

	• Distribution of income and transfers in the form of a social accounting matrix by country		• Distribution of income and transfers in the form of a social accounting matrix by country

	• Employment, capital, investment by country and sector		• Employment, capital, investment by country and sector

	• Greenhouse gasses, atmospheric emissions, pollution abatement capital, purchase of pollution permits and damages		• Greenhouse gasses, atmospheric emissions, pollution abatement capital, purchase of pollution permits and damages

	• Consumption matrix by product and investment matrix by ownership branch		• Consumption matrix by product and investment matrix by ownership branch

	• Public finance, tax incidence and revenues by country		• Public finance, tax incidence and revenues by country

	• Full bilateral trade matrices.		• Full bilateral trade matrices.


	'''Solution algorithm'''		'''Solution algorithm'''

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 17 October 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The design of GEM-E3 model has been developed following four main guidelines:		The design of GEM-E3 model has been developed following four main guidelines:

	• Model design around a basic general equilibrium core in a modular way so that different modelling options, market regimes and closure rules are supported by the same model specification		• Model design around a basic general equilibrium core in a modular way so that different modelling options, market regimes and closure rules are supported by the same model specification
	• Fully flexible (endogenous) coefficients in production and in consumer’s demand		• Fully flexible (endogenous) coefficients in production and in consumer’s demand
	• Calibration to a base year data set, incorporating detailed Social Accounting Matrices as statistically observed		• Calibration to a base year data set, incorporating detailed Social Accounting Matrices as statistically observed
	• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock		• Dynamic mechanisms, through the accumulation of capital stock.

	The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.		The GEM-E3 model starts from the same basic structure as the standard World Bank models. Following the tradition of these models, GEM-E3 is built on the basis of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The model is calibrated to a base year data set that comprises a full SAM for each country/region represented in the model. Bilateral trade flows are also calibrated for each sector represented in the model, taking into account trade margins and transport costs. Consumption and investment is built around transition matrices linking consumption by purpose to demand for goods and investment by origin to investment by destination. The initial starting point of the model therefore, includes a very detailed treatment of taxation and trade.

Line 25:		Line 27:

	The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:		The GEM-E3 model is built in a modular way around its central CGE core. It supports defining several alternative regimes and closure rules without having to re-specify or re-calibrate the model. The most important of these options are presented below:

	• Capital mobility across sectors and/or countries		• Capital mobility across sectors and/or countries
	• Flexible or fixed current account (with respect to the foreign sector)		• Flexible or fixed current account (with respect to the foreign sector)
Line 30:		Line 33:
	• Market for pollution permits national/international, environmental constraints		• Market for pollution permits national/international, environmental constraints
	• Fixed or flexible public deficit		• Fixed or flexible public deficit
	• Perfect competition or Nash-Cournot competition assumptions for market competition regimes		• Perfect competition or Nash-Cournot competition assumptions for market competition regimes.
	Reference scenario and counterfactual simulations
			'''Reference scenario and counterfactual simulations'''

	Once the model is calibrated, the next step is to define a reference case scenario. The reference case scenario includes all already decided policies. The key drivers of economic growth in the model are labour force, total factor productivity and the expectations on sectoral growth.		Once the model is calibrated, the next step is to define a reference case scenario. The reference case scenario includes all already decided policies. The key drivers of economic growth in the model are labour force, total factor productivity and the expectations on sectoral growth.

	The “counterfactual” equilibria can be computed by running the model under assumptions that diverge from those of the reference scenario. This corresponds to scenario building. In this case, a scenario is defined as a set of changes of exogenous variables, for example a change in the tax rates. Changes of institutional regimes, that are expected to occur in the future, may be reflected by changing values of the appropriate elasticities and other model parameters that allow structural shifts (e.g. market regime). These changes are imposed on top of the assumptions of the reference scenario thereby modifying it.		The “counterfactual” equilibria can be computed by running the model under assumptions that diverge from those of the reference scenario. This corresponds to scenario building. In this case, a scenario is defined as a set of changes of exogenous variables, for example a change in the tax rates. Changes of institutional regimes, that are expected to occur in the future, may be reflected by changing values of the appropriate elasticities and other model parameters that allow structural shifts (e.g. market regime). These changes are imposed on top of the assumptions of the reference scenario thereby modifying it.

	To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.		To perform a counterfactual simulation it is not necessary to re-calibrate the model. The different steps for performing a counterfactual simulation in GEM-E3 are depicted in the figure below.

	Figure 1.2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3		Figure 1.2: Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3

			[[File:Figure 1.2 Steps for scenario simulation in GEM-E3.jpg]]

	A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.		A counterfactual simulation is characterized by its impact on consumer’s welfare or through the equivalent variation of his welfare function. The approach adopted in most of the applied general equilibrium models regards the use of the monetary utility function, which measures the nominal income that the consumer needs for a given price vector in order to be at the same welfare level with a different income level and a price vector. With this measure it is possible to quantify the effects on welfare of alternative policy scenarios. This measure shows the income that should be given to/taken off the consumer so as to be found at the same welfare level found with the reference scenario prices. A positive value of this measure means a positive change in consumer welfare. The equivalent variation can be, under reasonable assumptions, directly mapped to some of the endogenous variables of the model such as consumption, employment and price levels.

	The most important results, provided by GEM-E3, are as follows:		The most important results, provided by GEM-E3, are as follows:

	• Dynamic annual projections in volume, value and deflators of national accounts by country		• Dynamic annual projections in volume, value and deflators of national accounts by country
	• Full Input-Output tables for each country/region identified in the model		• Full Input-Output tables for each country/region identified in the model
Line 46:		Line 58:
	• Consumption matrix by product and investment matrix by ownership branch		• Consumption matrix by product and investment matrix by ownership branch
	• Public finance, tax incidence and revenues by country		• Public finance, tax incidence and revenues by country
	• Full bilateral trade matrices		• Full bilateral trade matrices.
	Solution algorithm
			'''Solution algorithm'''

	The model is formulated as a simultaneous system of equations with an equal number of variables. The system is solved for each year following a time-forward path. The model uses the GAMS software and is written as a mixed non-linear complementarity problem solved by using the PATH algorithm using the standard solver options.		The model is formulated as a simultaneous system of equations with an equal number of variables. The system is solved for each year following a time-forward path. The model uses the GAMS software and is written as a mixed non-linear complementarity problem solved by using the PATH algorithm using the standard solver options.

	The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.		The model is modularly built allowing the user to select among a number of alternative closure options and market institutional regimes depending on the issue under study.
	History of GEM-E3		History of GEM-E3
	The GEM-E3 model is the result of a collaborative effort by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA/E3M-Lab, leading partner), Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KUL), University of Manheim and the centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Ecole Centrale de Paris (ERASME) as the core modelling team. NTUA/E3M-Lab have maintained and further developed the GEM-E3 model in various aspects including the introduction of market imperfections, the construction of GEM-E3 world version, bottom-up representation of power generation technologies, equilibrium unemployment, a complete coverage of all GHG, and the introduction of semi-endogenous growth features.		The GEM-E3 model is the result of a collaborative effort by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA/E3M-Lab, leading partner), Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven (KUL), University of Manheim and the centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Ecole Centrale de Paris (ERASME) as the core modelling team. NTUA/E3M-Lab have maintained and further developed the GEM-E3 model in various aspects including the introduction of market imperfections, the construction of GEM-E3 world version, bottom-up representation of power generation technologies, equilibrium unemployment, a complete coverage of all GHG, and the introduction of semi-endogenous growth features.
	Applications of the model have been carried out for several Directorate Generals of the European Commission (economic affairs, competition, environment, taxation, research) and for national authorities. GEM-E3 is used regularly to provide analytical support to European Commission services, particularly with regards to the economics of climate change.		Applications of the model have been carried out for several Directorate Generals of the European Commission (economic affairs, competition, environment, taxation, research) and for national authorities. GEM-E3 is used regularly to provide analytical support to European Commission services, particularly with regards to the economics of climate change.