Policy - REMIND-MAgPIE - Revision history

Lavinia Baumstark: adjust to REMIND-MAgPIE

2022-01-25T09:49:31Z

adjust to REMIND-MAgPIE

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |DocumentationCategory=Policy
 }}
 <references />

Rineke Oostenrijk: Text replacement - "REMIND" to "REMIND-MAgPIE"

2021-11-21T13:34:20Z

Text replacement - "REMIND" to "REMIND-MAgPIE"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 21 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ModelDocumentationTemplate		{{ModelDocumentationTemplate
	\|IsEmpty=No		\|IsEmpty=No
	\|IsDocumentationOf=REMIND		\|IsDocumentationOf=REMIND-MAgPIE
	\|DocumentationCategory=Policy		\|DocumentationCategory=Policy
	}}		}}
	In the climate policy mode, REMIND imposes an additional climate policy constraint on the welfare maximization. Examples include limits on temperature, forcing (from Kyoto gases or all radiative substances), CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, cumulative carbon budget, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over time. REMIND calculates the corresponding mitigation costs as a reduction of consumption or GDP with respect to the baseline case.		In the climate policy mode, REMIND-MAgPIE imposes an additional climate policy constraint on the welfare maximization. Examples include limits on temperature, forcing (from Kyoto gases or all radiative substances), CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, cumulative carbon budget, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over time. REMIND-MAgPIE calculates the corresponding mitigation costs as a reduction of consumption or GDP with respect to the baseline case.

	We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region's budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.		We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND-MAgPIE implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region's budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.

	REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region's final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND's time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA <ref>Schwanitz VJ, Piontek F, Bertram C, Luderer G (2014) Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67:882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.015</ref>.		REMIND-MAgPIE also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region's final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND-MAgPIE's time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA <ref>Schwanitz VJ, Piontek F, Bertram C, Luderer G (2014) Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67:882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.015</ref>.

Mathijs Harmsen: Mathijs Harmsen moved page Policy - REMIND to Policy - REMIND-MAgPIE without leaving a redirect: Text replacement - "REMIND" to "REMIND-MAgPIE"

2021-11-18T12:14:14Z

Mathijs Harmsen moved page Policy - REMIND to Policy - REMIND-MAgPIE without leaving a redirect: Text replacement - "REMIND" to "REMIND-MAgPIE"

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:14, 18 November 2021

Laura Delsa at 10:24, 3 February 2017

2017-02-03T10:24:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 3 February 2017
Line 62:		Line 62:


	<~~refrences~~ />		<references />

Laura Delsa at 10:24, 3 February 2017

2017-02-03T10:24:19Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{ModelDocumentationTemplate
 |IsDocumentationOf=REMIND
 |DocumentationCategory=Policy
@@ Line 7: / Line 8: @@
 We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region's budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.
-REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region's final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND's time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA (Schwanitz et al. 2014).
+REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region's final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND's time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA <ref>Schwanitz VJ, Piontek F, Bertram C, Luderer G (2014) Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67:882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.015</ref>.

Laura Delsa at 09:45, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T09:45:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 17 October 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In the climate policy mode, REMIND imposes an additional climate policy constraint on the welfare maximization. Examples include limits on temperature, forcing (from Kyoto gases or all radiative substances), CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, cumulative carbon budget, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over time. REMIND calculates the corresponding mitigation costs as a reduction of consumption or GDP with respect to the baseline case.		In the climate policy mode, REMIND imposes an additional climate policy constraint on the welfare maximization. Examples include limits on temperature, forcing (from Kyoto gases or all radiative substances), CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, cumulative carbon budget, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over time. REMIND calculates the corresponding mitigation costs as a reduction of consumption or GDP with respect to the baseline case.

	We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region?s budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.		We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region's budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.

	REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region?s final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND?s time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA (Schwanitz et al. 2014).		REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region's final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND's time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA (Schwanitz et al. 2014).

Rineke Oostenrijk: 1 revision imported

2016-08-17T09:59:36Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision

Revision as of 11:59, 17 August 2016

Rineke Oostenrijk at 13:07, 16 August 2016

2016-08-16T13:07:11Z

New page

{{ModelDocumentationTemplate
|IsDocumentationOf=REMIND
|DocumentationCategory=Policy
}}
In the climate policy mode, REMIND imposes an additional climate policy constraint on the welfare maximization. Examples include limits on temperature, forcing (from Kyoto gases or all radiative substances), CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, cumulative carbon budget, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over time. REMIND calculates the corresponding mitigation costs as a reduction of consumption or GDP with respect to the baseline case.

We can also study the impact of a pre-specified carbon tax pathway. For such scenarios, REMIND implements the tax as a penalty on emissions. Since it assumes full recycling of tax-revenues, the solution algorithm for such scenarios is less straightforward. It counterbalances the tax expenditure as part of each region?s budget constraint by a fixed amount of tax revenue that is recycled in a lump-sum manner. It then runs iteratively with adjusted tax revenues until it matches the level of tax payments.

REMIND also accounts for subsidies and taxes in the energy sector and implements them as a price mark-up on a region?s final demand of solids, heating oil, diesel, and petrol used in transport, as well as gas and electricity used in the stationary sector. The global total amounts to approximately 450 billion USD per year. The development of fossil fuel subsidies and taxes over REMIND?s time horizon is prescribed by scenario assumptions. In the default case, subsidies phase out by 2050. Historical data are based on the IEA subsidies database and the International Energy Database, ENERDATA (Schwanitz et al. 2014).